Trust center

Security posture for DPP workflows buyers can inspect.

Redy coordinates manufacturer requests, supplier evidence, approvals, APIs, and passport outputs. This page explains the controls behind that workflow and separates current posture from certification roadmap.

Control surface
workspace authority -> scoped APIs -> audit trail
Diligence ready
Issuer actions
Org-gated

Only manufacturer workspaces with issuer authority can create, publish, export, or revoke DPPs.

Supplier access
Scoped

Suppliers can operate independently while grants and requests keep manufacturer access explicit.

API keys
Lane-bound

DPP issuer scopes and supplier-platform scopes stay separated at creation and rotation.

Public intake
Throttled

Unauthenticated contact surfaces are guarded and escaped before email delivery.

Control map

Trust starts with what the product refuses to let users bypass.

Access

Authority follows the organization, not the button someone clicked.

Redy separates manufacturer issuer workspaces from supplier workspaces. Runtime guards check organization capability before issuer actions, and API scopes are minted from the same lane model.

  • Org capability checks
  • Scoped API keys
  • Supplier/manufacturer lane separation
  • Invite and membership based access
Auditability

Passport changes need an explanation trail.

DPP operations preserve state transitions, version history, provenance context, and audit attribution so teams can explain what changed before a passport was published.

  • Version snapshots
  • Review states
  • Audit records
  • Provenance-safe field views
Integration

External systems get controlled surfaces, not database reach-through.

Portal and B2B flows use scoped APIs, lane-specific permissions, idempotency patterns, and webhooks so integrations can move approved data without bypassing workflow controls.

  • Scoped B2B APIs
  • Supplier-platform API
  • Idempotency posture
  • Webhook delivery controls
Standards posture

Identifier and resolver claims should be precise.

Buyers need to know Redy understands QR access, unique identifiers, GS1 Digital Link patterns, and resolver behavior. The public claim still has to stay inside what is implemented and supportable.

Battery passport access

QR access with standards-aligned identifiers

The EU Battery Regulation requires QR-based access and unique identifiers for in-scope battery passports from 18 February 2027. Redy positions GS1 Digital Link as a strong implementation pattern, not as a regulation-mandated requirement.

GS1 Digital Link

GTIN, batch, and serial-level resolution patterns

Redy resolver design follows GS1 Digital Link URI patterns such as GTIN, batch/lot, and serial segments so one product identifier can point to the right DPP resources.

Resolver behavior

One scan can route to more than one resource

The resolver model can separate public passport pages, machine-readable data, certification context, sustainability evidence, safety information, and role-based resources.

Data dictionary (EN 18223 §4.3 model)

A public dictionary you can read without an account

Redy publishes a public, unauthenticated DPP data dictionary following the EN 18223 section 4.3 decoupled-dictionary model, with English and Spanish labels and cross-references to schema.org, the GS1 Web Vocabulary, and CIRPASS-2. Paywalled catalogues like ECLASS stay opt-in cross-references, never a requirement.

View the dictionary
Resolver examples

Target URI patterns for DPP resolution.

Model

GTIN-level passport or product model resource.

Batch

Batch or lot-level evidence and status.

Serial

Item-level resource for a serialized battery or product unit.

Claims guardrails

Strong claims need proof.

  • Say standards-aligned or designed for GS1 Digital Link patterns unless formal conformance is earned.
  • Do not say the Battery Regulation mandates GS1 Digital Link by name.
  • Use the fixed in-scope battery passport date carefully: 18 February 2027.
  • Describe future domain timelines with delegated-act caveats unless the date is fixed.
  • Cite EN 18223 by clause (e.g. section 4.3 dictionary model) for what is implemented. Do not claim full EN 18223 conformance or certification until the standard is cited in the Official Journal of the EU.
Certifications

Clear posture now. Formal badges when they are earned.

Trust pages should not invent certifications. Redy can still give buyers a useful diligence path by showing implemented controls, roadmap items, and the documents teams can request.

Current posture

Security controls mapped for diligence

Access control, auditability, rate limiting, key scope separation, and supplier/manufacturer workspace boundaries are documented as buyer diligence material.

In place

Qualified electronic seal (QSeal)

Redy holds a qualified electronic seal issued by a qualified trust service provider (QTSP) under eIDAS. It is held at organisation level; passport credential signing is separate and runs at substantial assurance today.

Roadmap

SOC 2 readiness

Redy should not claim SOC 2 certification until an audit is complete. The trust page tracks the readiness posture and the path to formal attestation.

Roadmap

ISO 27001 alignment

Control families can be mapped to ISO 27001 expectations as the platform moves from launch posture toward formal certification.

Available for review

DPA, subprocessors, and privacy materials

Buyer review should have a clear path for data processing terms, subprocessor visibility, and privacy questions before production onboarding.

Data boundaries

Manufacturer, supplier, and public passport data are not the same lane.

Manufacturer data

Issuer workspace records

  • DPP drafts and published versions
  • Supplier requests and approval decisions
  • Organization users, roles, and issuer authority
Supplier data

Reusable evidence records

  • Supplier-owned submissions
  • Source evidence and certification context
  • Grant and reuse decisions tied to requests
Public data

Published passport surfaces

  • Approved DPP fields
  • Consumer-facing passport views
  • Provenance-safe output, not private workroom state
AI guardrails

Assistants can help with evidence work, but authority still has to be explicit.

Redy treats AI-assisted work as an extension of the governed workflow, not a shortcut around consent, review, or audit.

See AI controls
  • Assistant actions use scoped consent rather than blanket account access.
  • Write operations are designed around preview, confirmation, commit, and audit.
  • Supplier and manufacturer write lanes stay separate, matching the portal and API model.
  • Agent access can be revoked at the client or session boundary.
  • AI output is treated as proposed work until a user or authorized workflow commits it.
Diligence pack

Give security reviewers a direct path to the details.

The public page should answer first-pass questions. Enterprise buyers can request the deeper materials behind the current posture and roadmap.

Security architecture summary
Data processing agreement path
Subprocessor and hosting disclosure path
Incident response contact path
Certification roadmap and current posture
API scope and workspace authority model