Why Redy exists
The passport surface is not the hard part.
A public product page can look finished while the evidence behind it is incomplete, unverifiable, or trapped in supplier spreadsheets.
About Redy
Redy exists to make supplier evidence usable for Digital Product Passports.
Digital Product Passports will only be credible if the claims behind them can be requested, reviewed, traced, versioned, and explained. Redy is building that operating layer for manufacturers and suppliers.
Why the company exists
evidence before passport surface
Problem
supplier evidence is the bottleneck
Focus
request, review, approve, publish
Users
manufacturers and suppliers first
Supplier response stays free.
Manufacturers pay for governed readiness, approval, publication, and integration workflows. Suppliers should be able to answer without buying another portal.
Mission
Make DPP claims traceable before they become public.
Redy is not trying to win by making another static passport page. The bet is that DPP teams need an operating workflow for the messy evidence behind each claim.
What Redy does
Redy turns missing fields into governed work.
Manufacturers can request supplier evidence, suppliers can respond with reusable records, and approved claims keep source context attached.
Where it goes
DPP operations should survive changing schemas.
As product groups and standards mature, the operating pattern stays stable: request evidence, approve claims, preserve provenance, publish versions.
Principles
Product principles for a market that will keep changing.
Evidence before surface
A credible DPP starts with source evidence, not with the final page template.
Suppliers should not pay to answer
Supplier response should be easy, scoped, and free so manufacturers can get accurate data from the companies that hold it.
Humans approve claims
AI can accelerate extraction, but publication needs explicit review state, source context, and accountable decisions.
Standards matter, lock-in does not
Redy is built around ESPR-aware schemas, resolver patterns, APIs, exports, and provenance that can move with the market.
How we build
The system is designed around accountable data movement.
The core product surface is the evidence workflow: what is missing, who owns it, what was submitted, who approved it, and which passport version uses it.
Explore featuresWorkflow
Missing fields become supplier requests, supplier responses become reviewable claims, and approvals become publishable records.
Gap trackingSupplier requestsClaim review
Trust layer
Approved values keep evidence, actor, timestamp, grant, version, and source-document context attached.
Audit trailProvenanceVersion history
Platform
DPP records can feed passport pages, APIs, webhooks, exports, QR flows, and resolver-ready implementations.
APIsWebhooksPublished DPPs
Roadmap posture
Build for the workflow first, then adapt to each product domain.
DPP requirements will land in waves. Redy is built so the request, review, provenance, and publication workflow remains useful as categories and schemas mature.
Manufacturer readiness
Help teams understand which product records are missing supplier-held evidence before launch pressure becomes project chaos.
Supplier response and reuse
Make it practical for suppliers to submit once, review extracted values, attach source documents, and reuse approved evidence.
Audit-ready publication
Move approved claims into versioned DPP outputs while preserving provenance, access controls, and integration hooks.
Domain expansion
Support batteries, textiles, and future ESPR product groups through the same evidence workflow as schemas mature.
About FAQ
The company story should make the product direction clearer.
Is Redy a consumer product registry?
No. Consumer views may be an output after publication, but Redy is now focused on the manufacturer and supplier workflow required to create trustworthy DPP data.
Is Redy only for battery passports?
No. Batteries are an urgent early category, but the platform is designed around a schema-flexible evidence workflow for multiple DPP domains.
What makes Redy different from a DPP page generator?
Redy focuses on the work behind the page: missing fields, supplier requests, source evidence, AI-assisted extraction, human approval, audit trail, and versioned publication.
Who should talk to Redy first?
Manufacturers preparing DPP programs, suppliers getting repeated data requests, and teams responsible for product data, compliance, sourcing, or integration architecture.
Talk to Redy about the evidence workflow behind your DPP program.
Start with product groups, supplier-held fields, approval owners, integrations, and launch scope.