Stop rebuilding the same evidence packet for every customer.
A supplier can preserve declarations, certificates, audit letters, material records, and source context as reusable records instead of copying the same files into new spreadsheets.
Redy gives suppliers an independent workspace for scoped manufacturer requests: upload source evidence, review extracted values, approve sharing grants, and build reusable records without spreadsheet churn.
Answer requests and share supplier evidence without a paid Redy account.
A supplier can register and operate without being owned by one manufacturer invite.
Approved records can support future requests when the supplier authorizes reuse.
Grants define which customer, product, field set, and source visibility are allowed.

The supplier workspace: data records at 100% field coverage for the selected Redy record schemas — material composition, carbon footprint, recycled content. Answer once, reuse everywhere.
DPP evidence often lives with suppliers. Redy makes participation easier by keeping requests narrow and evidence reusable.
A supplier can preserve declarations, certificates, audit letters, material records, and source context as reusable records instead of copying the same files into new spreadsheets.
Redy keeps the request scoped to product, passport version, required field, deadline, and manufacturer context so suppliers are not dropped into an open-ended portal.
Suppliers approve grants for specific customers and use cases. Source files and reuse permissions stay attached to the supplier-owned record.
The supplier sees who is asking, which product the DPP request belongs to, and what fields are missing.
Upload declarations, certificates, spec sheets, audit letters, LCA references, or other source documents tied to the requested claim.
OCR and AI can suggest structured values, but supplier review is required before anything is shared.
The supplier decides what can be shared, with whom, for which product or field set, and under what reuse window.
When another customer asks for similar evidence, the supplier can reuse the record instead of starting from zero.
The value is not just answering one manufacturer. It is saving source context, review state, and grants so the next request can start from an approved record.
No. Responding to DPP requests, sharing supplier evidence, and reusing supplier-owned evidence records are free supplier participation workflows.
Yes. A supplier workspace should be able to operate independently. Manufacturer requests can still create scoped access, but they should not own the supplier organization.
The supplier controls the sharing grant. A manufacturer can request evidence, but the supplier decides what source context and approved values can be shared for the requested use case.
No. AI and OCR can help extract proposed values from documents, but supplier review and permission controls decide what becomes shareable evidence.
Suppliers can keep their evidence library independent while still responding to manufacturer DPP requests through scoped grants.