18 February 2027
In-scope battery passports move from planning concern to operating requirement.
In-scope battery passports have a fixed 18 February 2027 obligation. Redy helps teams turn material, carbon, recycled content, due diligence, and supplier attestation gaps into governed requests and versioned passport data before the deadline becomes the project.
In-scope battery passports move from planning concern to operating requirement.
The passport obligation applies by battery category, not by whether the supplier data is easy to collect.
The passport has to be reachable through a QR code linked to a unique identifier.
Public, restricted, and legitimate-interest access needs should inherit the same reviewed evidence trail.
The battery passport is accessed through a QR code linked to a unique identifier, but the defensibility problem starts before the scan: manufacturers need reviewed, supplier-backed data for the fields that make the passport credible.
In-scope battery passports move from planning concern to operating requirement.
The passport obligation applies by battery category, not by whether the supplier data is easy to collect.
The passport has to be reachable through a QR code linked to a unique identifier.
Public, restricted, and legitimate-interest access needs should inherit the same reviewed evidence trail.
Collect supplier records for chemistry, component identity, source declarations, and bill-of-material context without spreading data across email threads.
Request and review evidence for recycled material claims, reuse context, and recovery-related fields as schemas mature.
Coordinate source documents, LCA references, and supplier attestations that support carbon and footprint-related passport claims.
Keep due diligence declarations, audit letters, certifications, and supplier approvals tied to the passport version they support.
Redy keeps the domain schema, supplier submission, reviewer decision, and published DPP version connected so a battery program can explain where each claim came from.
Chemistry declarations, component records, source references, and bill-of-material context.
Scoped request, supplier-owned response, review state, version attribution.
LCA references, production footprint data, energy inputs, and supporting methodology notes.
Document attachment, extracted values, source context, approval before publication.
Supplier declarations, certificates, batch context, and recovery or recycled material claims.
Reusable evidence records and grant controls so approved data can support more than one DPP.
Audit letters, policy attestations, certifications, and risk-screening evidence.
Audit log, reviewer attribution, and a clear split between submitted evidence and approved claims.
Operational, service, repair, repurposing, or recycling information when applicable to the battery category.
Role-aware access posture and passport version history as data changes after publication.
Battery evidence is domain-specific, but the control model should stay consistent: scoped requests, supplier-owned responses, manufacturer review, provenance, versioning, and controlled publication.
Redy keeps output surfaces tied to approved data, source context, and version history.